Ben Hughes is Vice Principal (Industry Engagement) at Pearson College London

nicola dandridge100x100“Don’t call students consumers” Nicola Dandridge CBE, Chief Executive of the new Office for Students, was reported as saying at the launch of its new regulatory framework last month.

“We now need to ensure the new Office for Students is empowered to protect students and take enforcement action if university providers breach consumer protection laws," commented Which? Magazine’s Alex Hayman afterwards.

So are they consumers or not? Personally I’ve never had a problem with the term, as a confirmed believer in Shaw’s axiom that all professions are conspiracies against the laity.

As I’ve argued in these pages before, I regard the student consumer as a far more reliable guide to the teaching excellence or otherwise of a lecturer than partial peer review.

Given the historic primacy of research in universities, arising from both provider incentives through REF-driven funding as well as provider choice through academic preference, it’s not unreasonable to fear a mismatch between what the now paying public wants and what it will get.

If, as the Rolling Stones almost said, you can’t or perhaps shouldn’t always give the student consumer what they want, if we try sometimes, well we just might find, we give them what they need…

Thus I have always argued before horrified academics, outraged at my consumerist analogy between a university and a gym - as though the cultivation of a healthy body was obviously completely different from the cultivation of a healthy mind.

On reflection, they were of course quite right.

It’s ludicrously easy to enter into long term financial commitments with gyms even if one has no aptitude for or genuine interest in physical work, and the promised returns are often completely illusory.

What you get out of a gym really depends entirely on what you put in, however dedicated your ‘personal trainer’ (who often seems more interested in improving their own body than yours).

Everyone there always seems to have been born in Lycra, with polished ‘guns’ (they have a language all of their own you know) and buffed up bodies, and first time users don’t stand a chance, with many wanting to drop out in the first few weeks if they can escape their contracts.

Oh and the wifi’s terrible… So really nothing like a university at all.

You get the point. As successive governments have exhorted students, Waitrose-like, to be more demanding I have cheered them on from the side lines. No bleeding heart liberal academic heart beats within my breast.

Sam Gyimah100x100Why then did even I feel a slight twinge of discomfort at that launch event at the end of February, where the Minister of State, Sam Gyimah MP, trumpeted, “The biggest shake up to Higher Education in 25 years… placing students at the very heart of higher education,” echoing the title of the White Paper which promised the last biggest shake up back in 2011.

"Gone are the days when students venerated institutions and were thankful to be admitted. We are in a new age – the age of the student” he declared.

I wasn’t there but the QE II Conference Centre must have felt like Paris or Berkeley in 1968. Or must it…

I vividly remember going to Oxford for the first time and venerating it enormously, being deliriously thankful to be admitted when my offer letter came through.

I don’t know but I imagine that the Minister felt something similar after making the journey from a state school to those same dreaming spires.

For me, that was the age of the student, when Oasis conquered all before them and three years past in a Blur.

“One area where I particularly think work needs to be done is in mental health” Gyimah continued. “Several students have raised this issue with me on my tour and said they feel that the provision and understanding of the pressures on students needs to evolve”.

But what are those pressures Minister? “It’s not surprising that they expect clear evidence that this is a valuable investment”.

Of course, investments are a stressful business aren’t they.

“The value of your investments can go down as well as up. This means that you may get back less than you invest” as you will read in any financial investment prospectus but curiously not in any university prospectus.

Indeed, being a consumer is a stressful business, requiring eternal vigilance that you’re getting value for money and not getting ripped off by some rapacious profiteer desperate to part you from your money.

But then a change of tone. “I passionately believe that higher education is not a simple transaction. In the world of value for money, this can sometimes get lost. We cannot regulate universities in the same way we regulate water companies. What students want from their universities goes beyond simply the provision of lectures and labs in return for fees. We don’t want to narrow the debate, reducing all the issues to pounds and pence. What makes going to university valuable is the experience. Students want to be part of universities that change their lives for the better”.

Reassuring perhaps. But how are universities meant to effect this change, let alone transform lives, merely by giving students what they want as opposed to what they may need?

The two aren’t necessarily in conflict of course, but as anyone with a passing knowledge of human psychology or the challenge of giving up smoking knows, they very well might be.

And what of the four regulatory objectives of the OfS?

To ensure: “All students, from all backgrounds, and with the ability and desire to undertake higher education:

  1. Are supported to access, succeed in, and progress from, higher education.
  2. Receive a high quality academic experience…
  3. Are able to progress into employment or further study, and their qualifications hold their value over time.
  4. Receive value for money”.

Take the first: Access

“We need to look at all forms of disadvantage, including BME” said Gyimah.

Well-intentioned of course, and Gyimah’s own personal story furnishes an inspiring narrative, but is it really helpful to talk of being black or minority ethnic as being a ‘disadvantage’?

Does it make any sense to use this generic classification term, when membership of certain non-white ethnic groups confers significant educational advantage and that of certain white communities does the opposite?

And that’s before you get to the detail of access and participation plans, the reward for excellence in which is the paradoxical prize of being able to charge their beneficiaries more (through registration in the ‘Approved (fee cap)’ category.

Because that’s really what the category is called in which you can charge the highest fees. I’m not making this up.

And if you don’t measure up to what you promise in your plan?

Then a Stalin show trial-style apology awaits in your access statement, along the lines of this typical example I found on the internet: “We acknowledge that the University is making slower than expected progress in the recruitment of young and mature entrants from POLAR3 low participation neighbourhoods.” And sorry about the tractor production…

This slightly sinister aspect to what may be thought laudable social engineering objectives doesn’t end there.

At the same launch event, Chairman Michael (Barber) promised that the OfS would, “Work with employers and with regional and national industry representatives to ensure that student choices are aligned with current and future needs for higher level skills”.

Quite how you can ensure such an alignment whilst retaining anything meaningful in the word ‘choice’ is as hard to grasp as how you can ‘secure student success’ (in the language of the OfS’s regulatory framework) whilst retaining room for individual human agency.

Take the second: A high quality academic experience

The primary vehicle for which is the Teaching Excellence Framework. Don’t get me wrong, I fully support the concept of a parallel framework for measuring excellence in teaching analogous to the REF, and as indicated at the start, applaud the use of student feedback within that.

But you don’t have to be a Guardian editorialist or worship the water the good Lord Adonis walks on to be sceptical of any alleged link between good teaching and high future income.

Although if of course institutions are luring students in on the basis that the path leading from the graduation hall is inexorably paved with gold, then perhaps they have it coming.      

Take the third: Progress into employment or further study

Which is of course a proxy for grade inflation. But isn’t this arguably a natural consequence of the outraged student consumer questioning why they achieved a mark on their paper of 70 (thereby losing 30% of the total marks available) when they put down everything that was in the suggested answer and attended every single one of their (wholly inadequate) contact hours?

When a first is seen as the logical outcome of hard work plus good teaching, and something somewhere must have gone badly wrong if a mark falls to even the upper-reaches of the second class division? And if it reaches the lower end?! “Get Barber on the phone!”  

Take the fourth: Value for money

Defined in the glossary of the regulatory framework as “Meeting the need for efficiency, economy, effectiveness and prudence in the administration and expenditure of financial resources” - a rather narrow, institution-focused definition for a body designed to herald “The age of the student”.

I’ve never been more and at the same time less employable than at the moment of graduation.

Supremely employable by virtue of that magic piece of parchment. Completely unemployable because of the lamentable habits and behaviours learned at university, which had to be unlearned painfully in the years immediately following.

But even were that not compensated for by the all-important signifying 2:1, I wouldn’t for a moment say that it wasn’t worth every penny of someone else’s money back in the day, and my own today. But we need to be clear what we’re grading on.

 All of the above aims are of course laudable in themselves and I remain broadly speaking a fan of the OfS and a believer in the logic behind its creation. 

Who could object to striving to deliver what Barber termed, “An excellent education to all students”? But as Bill and Ted found back in the day, excellent adventures can turn all too easily into bogus journeys.

It is incumbent on all of us plying our trade in higher education under the watchful eye of the OfS to make sure we don’t lose our way.

Ben Hughes

As ever, Ben Hughes writes in a purely personal capacity, expressing his own views rather than those of his institution.

He is Vice Principal (Industry Engagement) at Pearson College London, where he will be chairing a debate on the purpose of a university on April 17th, putting questions to the OfS’s Carl Lygo, Lord Willetts, former Minister of State for Universities and Science, Dr. Wendy Piatt, former Director General of the Russell Group, Dr. Joanna Williams, author of ‘Consuming Higher Education: Why Learning Can’t Be Bought’ and Roxanne Stockwell, Principal of Pearson College London.

Please register if you’d like to come along for what promises to be a very lively debate: https://www.fenews.co.uk/create-event/viewevent/400-what-is-the-purpose-of-a-university

You may also be interested in these articles:

Register, Login or Login with your Social Media account:


Advertisers

Advertiser Skyscrapers

Video Advert

Newsroom Activity

Sarfraz Ahmed commented on Preparing learners for the jobs of the future post pandemic 9 hours 59 minutes ago

Cindy what an engaging article appropriate for our modern times. Definitely will share with others.

Latest Education News

Further Education News

The FE News Channel gives you the latest education news and updates on emerging education strategies and the #FutureofEducation and the #FutureofWork.

Providing trustworthy and positive Further Education news and views since 2003, we are a digital news channel with a mixture of written word articles, podcasts and videos. Our specialisation is providing you with a mixture of the latest education news, our stance is always positive, sector building and sharing different perspectives and views from thought leaders, to provide you with a think tank of new ideas and solutions to bring the education sector together and come up with new innovative solutions and ideas.

FE News publish exclusive peer to peer thought leadership articles from our feature writers, as well as user generated content across our network of over 3000 Newsrooms, offering multiple sources of the latest education news across the Education and Employability sectors.

FE News also broadcast live events, podcasts with leading experts and thought leaders, webinars, video interviews and Further Education news bulletins so you receive the latest developments in Skills News and across the Apprenticeship, Further Education and Employability sectors.

Every week FE News has over 200 articles and new pieces of content per week. We are a news channel providing the latest Further Education News, giving insight from multiple sources on the latest education policy developments, latest strategies, through to our thought leaders who provide blue sky thinking strategy, best practice and innovation to help look into the future developments for education and the future of work.

In May 2020, FE News had over 120,000 unique visitors according to Google Analytics and over 200 new pieces of news content every week, from thought leadership articles, to the latest education news via written word, podcasts, video to press releases from across the sector.

We thought it would be helpful to explain how we tier our latest education news content and how you can get involved and understand how you can read the latest daily Further Education news and how we structure our FE Week of content:

Main Features

Our main features are exclusive and are thought leadership articles and blue sky thinking with experts writing peer to peer news articles about the future of education and the future of work. The focus is solution led thought leadership, sharing best practice, innovation and emerging strategy. These are often articles about the future of education and the future of work, they often then create future education news articles. We limit our main features to a maximum of 20 per week, as they are often about new concepts and new thought processes. Our main features are also exclusive articles responding to the latest education news, maybe an insight from an expert into a policy announcement or response to an education think tank report or a white paper.

FE Voices

FE Voices was originally set up as a section on FE News to give a voice back to the sector. As we now have over 3,000 newsrooms and contributors, FE Voices are usually thought leadership articles, they don’t necessarily have to be exclusive, but usually are, they are slightly shorter than Main Features. FE Voices can include more mixed media with the Further Education News articles, such as embedded podcasts and videos. Our sector response articles asking for different comments and opinions to education policy announcements or responding to a report of white paper are usually held in the FE Voices section. If we have a live podcast in an evening or a radio show such as SkillsWorldLive radio show, the next morning we place the FE podcast recording in the FE Voices section.

Sector News

In sector news we have a blend of content from Press Releases, education resources, reports, education research, white papers from a range of contributors. We have a lot of positive education news articles from colleges, awarding organisations and Apprenticeship Training Providers, press releases from DfE to Think Tanks giving the overview of a report, through to helpful resources to help you with delivering education strategies to your learners and students.

Podcasts

We have a range of education podcasts on FE News, from hour long full production FE podcasts such as SkillsWorldLive in conjunction with the Federation of Awarding Bodies, to weekly podcasts from experts and thought leaders, providing advice and guidance to leaders. FE News also record podcasts at conferences and events, giving you one on one podcasts with education and skills experts on the latest strategies and developments.

We have over 150 education podcasts on FE News, ranging from EdTech podcasts with experts discussing Education 4.0 and how technology is complimenting and transforming education, to podcasts with experts discussing education research, the future of work, how to develop skills systems for jobs of the future to interviews with the Apprenticeship and Skills Minister.

We record our own exclusive FE News podcasts, work in conjunction with sector partners such as FAB to create weekly podcasts and daily education podcasts, through to working with sector leaders creating exclusive education news podcasts.

Education Video Interviews

FE News have over 700 FE Video interviews and have been recording education video interviews with experts for over 12 years. These are usually vox pop video interviews with experts across education and work, discussing blue sky thinking ideas and views about the future of education and work.

Events

FE News has a free events calendar to check out the latest conferences, webinars and events to keep up to date with the latest education news and strategies.

FE Newsrooms

The FE Newsroom is home to your content if you are a FE News contributor. It also help the audience develop relationship with either you as an individual or your organisation as they can click through and ‘box set’ consume all of your previous thought leadership articles, latest education news press releases, videos and education podcasts.

Do you want to contribute, share your ideas or vision or share a press release?

If you want to write a thought leadership article, share your ideas and vision for the future of education or the future of work, write a press release sharing the latest education news or contribute to a podcast, first of all you need to set up a FE Newsroom login (which is free): once the team have approved your newsroom (all content, newsrooms are all approved by a member of the FE News team- no robots are used in this process!), you can then start adding content (again all articles, videos and podcasts are all approved by the FE News editorial team before they go live on FE News). As all newsrooms and content are approved by the FE News team, there will be a slight delay on the team being able to review and approve content.

 RSS IconRSS Feed Selection Page