@UCU calls for government to protect university funding in order to safeguard UK’s recovery from the #coronavirus pandemic 

The Covid-19 pandemic and ensuing recession will lead to 111,000 fewer UK and 121,000 fewer international first-year students attending UK universities this year, resulting in a £2.5bn funding black hole, warns a report released today (23 Apr).

Alistair Jarvis100x100Chief Executive of Universities UK, Alistair Jarvis, said:

“Universities have a vital role to play in the recovery of economies and communities. This helpful report highlights the critical financial risks for the sector which not only threaten this role but put some universities at risk of financial failure.

“The union is absolutely right to warn of the knock-on impacts this would have for jobs, regional economics, local communities and students.

“Government must take urgent action to provide the support which can ensure universities are able to weather these very serious challenges, and to protect students, maintain research, and retain our capacity to drive the recovery of the economy and communities.”

Rebecca Long Bailey 100x100Rebecca Long-Bailey MP, Shadow Education Secretary, said:

“The Government must step in to support universities and mitigate their funding shortfall to prevent the significant economic impact this report predicts.

“UK universities must be valued as part of the frontline response to the coronavirus pandemic, supplying students to the NHS and conducting world-class research into the virus.

“Labour is calling on the Government to underwrite all Higher Education institutions to secure their future and their role in our economic recovery and acknowledge their contribution to the national effort to fight this pandemic.’’

Jo Grady 100x100UCU general secretary Jo Grady said:

‘This alarming report shows that university staff and students are now staring over the edge of a cliff and desperately need the government to step in and protect the sector. The government’s own analysis puts universities most at risk of financial pain from the current crisis and this report does not take account of other income losses, such as accommodation or conferencing

‘Our world-renowned universities are doing crucial work now as we hunt for a vaccine and will be vital engines for our recovery both nationally and in towns and cities across the UK. It is vital that the government underwrites funding lost from the fall in student numbers. These are unprecedented times and without urgent guarantees, our universities will be greatly damaged at just the time they are needed most.

‘Even with the current unfolding crisis, universities are still itching to compete to recruit students. This analysis shows how Universities UK’s student recruitment proposal simply shifts the financial pain around the sector. What students and staff really need at the moment is the government to stand behind their universities and for institutions to work cooperatively in the wider interest.

‘The vast majority of universities do not have the cash reserves to cover these losses and we would expect no university to exploit the crisis. They need to work with us to protect jobs and the sector.’

Dr Gavan Conlon, partner at London Economics, said:

"Many institutions have a very considerable exposure to international students, and the pandemic will result in a very substantial loss in enrolments and income. Government support of universities is crucial to protect students in the short term and institutional research and teaching capacity in the longer term.

"The proposed student numbers cap will not be enough to avoid an overly competitive market for the remaining pool of applicants, with the impact of this actually being worse for some institutions than the effect of the pandemic itself. Given the expected financial losses across the sector, the government’s response clearly needs to be sufficiently well funded and well planned."

Carly Schiff, insolvency lawyer at Fieldfisher with a particular interest in the education sector, said:

"Many universities were already in trouble financially before the coronavirus crisis and are expecting to suffer from Brexit, as they stand to lose EU lecturers, EU grants and EU students. This is going to have a big impact on research funding and capabilities.

"They are also facing a well-publicised pensions black hole.

"You can have the best managed budget in the world, but you will still run into trouble if you are underfunded. And for universities, at the moment, there is no way they can make more money.

"Some are looking for private investment, such as sponsorship, wealthy donors and sports funding, but this is not going to work for many."

Nick Hillman100x100Nick Hillman, Director of HEPI, said:

"It is great to see UCU and London Economics collaborating on such a detailed and important piece of work, which is based in part on some pre-crisis work undertaken for HEPI and Kaplan. I welcome the focus on the next financial year [2020/21], which is when the real pain will hit higher education, as well as the focus on what the crisis means for staff in higher education institutions and for the different regions of the UK.

"But the research needs to be part of the debate; it must not be regarded as the final word. We are in a very uncertain place right now. No one can accurately and securely predict what will happen with the progress of Covid-19; nor can we know for certain its full impact on educational institutions.

"There are grounds for querying some of the assumptions underlying the research. For example, the report assumes higher education will be considerably less attractive in 2020/21. Many dire predictions have been made on this already and no one seriously believes international student numbers will hold up. But, in a deep recession, some people may actually opt to stay in formal education. In short, the current crisis may nudge people who leave school (or graduate) while undecided about their next move to stay in education. In an economic crisis, deferring entry to the labour market makes more sense than opting for less education.

"So I wouldn’t currently bet my house on the report’s conclusion idea that there will be 111,000 fewer first-year home students, a drop of 16%, in the next academic year. Such forecasts seem to be based on the sort of polling evidence on future behaviour that wrongly predicted big falls in full-time study in England when fees increased to £9,000, and they are not guaranteed to happen.

"Moreover, the fine details that make up the headline totals matter a huge amount in research like this. This report assumes every single university will lose large numbers of students. So, for instance, it predicts 2,700 fewer first-year enrolments at each of Oxford and Cambridge – including around 900 fewer new home students at each place.

"That seems odd when there is usually huge surplus demand to attend our oldest universities. Moreover, many people are so scared of other prestigious universities sucking up a greater market share of home / EU students in the crisis that they have been demanding restrictions on student recruitment – and it is widely believed Ministers are sympathetic to this idea.

"No one should underestimate the severe impact of Covid-19 on higher education. But, given the diversity of our higher education sector, it is right to question how likely there is to be a severe recruitment crisis among all major student groups at every single institution.

"Universities need government support and the new report is a welcome addition to the evidence base explaining why this is so, but I still question the idea that it is based on ‘relatively optimistic outcomes for higher education providers’.

"Above all, we must be careful we do not foster the very conditions we want to avoid by letting pessimism take over. We must not only imply to our fellow citizens or to the rest of the world that UK universities are halfway to hell in a handcart when, in reality, every single conceivable model of a successful post-Covid and post-Brexit UK economy has our outward-facing universities at its heart.

"And that, of course, is why – despite our differences on the best ways to model the effect of the current crisis on the higher education sector – I agree with London Economics and the UCU that our universities need proper support in the months ahead."

The report, by London Economics for the University and College Union (UCU), shows that the universities hit hardest by the falls in fee and grant income are those that cater for significant numbers of international students. However, the difficulties those universities face will also have severe knock-on effects for the rest of the sector. - See table 1

Driven by the significantly higher tuition fees charged to non-EU students, the largest decline in income is the expected loss of £1.51bn from those students. Approximately £612m of the loss comes from a drop in UK students, with a further £350m from the fall in EU students. - See table 2

The report warns that, without government intervention, an estimated 30,000 university jobs are at risk, with a further 32,000 jobs under threat throughout the wider economy. The total economic cost to the country from the reduced direct and indirect economic activity generated by universities due to the loss in income is estimated at more than £6bn. - See tables 3 and 4

The report comes just a week after analysis by the Office for Budget Responsibility said education would be the sector hardest hit by the coronavirus crisis, with the impact likely to be felt most by universities. The report does not take account of other income losses, such as accommodation or conferencing, and is predicated on what the authors believe is a relatively optimistic approach to the recovery.

UCU said the government had to act now to protect the income of universities or it risked inflicting huge damage on a sector which will be crucial to the national recovery, and is a key player in local economies across the UK.  

According to London Economics’ analysis, all universities would suffer substantial falls in income, with 91 institutions (almost three-quarters) left in a critical financial position where income only just covers expenditure. - See table 5

The report also warns that a recent proposal from Universities UK - to allow institutions to recruit more students - up to a cap of 5% on top of their existing numbers - would merely shift the financial impact onto less wealthy institutions. - See table 6

At the start of the month, the union wrote to education secretary Gavin Williamson with seven proposals it said would ensure universities and colleges can retain academic capacity now and play their part in the recovery.

 

Table 1 - Estimated impact of the pandemic on first-year student enrolments in 2020-21, by student domicile and institution cluster 

 

Cluster 1

Cluster 2

Cluster 3

Cluster 4

Total

% diff (to baseline)

# of HEIs

2

38

67

18

125

-

 

Total across all HEIs

UK

-1,775

-32,725

-63,820

-12,820

-111,140

-16%

EU

-1,025

-13,310

-11,815

-2,260

-28,410

-47%

Non-EU

-2,595

-56,560

-31,115

-2,075

-92,345

-47%

Total

-5,395

-102,595

-106,750

-17,155

-231,895

-24%

Average per HEI

UK

-885

-860

-955

-710

-890

-16%

EU

-510

-350

-175

-130

-225

-47%

Non-EU

-1,295

-1,490

-465

-115

-740

-47%

Total

-2,690

-2,700

-1,595

-955

-1,845

-24%

Note: All numbers are rounded to the nearest 5.

Source: London Economics’ analysis

Table 2 - Estimated impact of the pandemic on universities’ income in 2020-21, by institution cluster 

Cluster 1

Cluster 2

Cluster 3

Cluster 4

Total

% diff (to baseline)

# of HEIs

2

38

67

18

125

-

 

Total across all HEIs

Tuition fees

(£82m)

(£1,336m)

(£809m)

(£108m)

(£2,334m)

-13%

Teaching grants

(£2m)

(£65m)

(£64m)

(£6m)

(£137m)

-7%

Other income

-

-

-

-

-

-

Total

(£85m)

(£1,400m)

(£872m)

(£114m)

(£2,472m)

-7%

Average per HEI

Tuition fees

(£41m)

(£35m)

(£12m)

(£6m)

(£19m)

-13%

Teaching grants

(£1m)

(£2m)

(£1m)

(£0m)

(£1m)

-7%

Other income

-

-

-

-

-

-

Total

(£42m)

(£37m)

(£13m)

(£6m)

(£20m)

-7%

Note: All numbers are rounded to the nearest £m.                  

Source: London Economics’ analysis

Table 3 - Number of staff employed by HEIs in 2020-21 (in headcount), baseline vs. after pandemic, by cluster

Cluster 1

Cluster 2

Cluster 3

Cluster 4

Total

# of HEIs

2

38

67

18

125

 

Total across all HEIs

Baseline

29,365

256,655

165,945

23,015

474,980

After pandemic

28,860

240,705

153,790

21,345

444,700

Difference

-505

-15,950

-12,155

-1,670

-30,280

Average per HEI

Baseline

14,685

6,755

2,475

1,280

3,800

After pandemic

14,430

6,335

2,295

1,185

3,560

Difference

-255

-420

-180

-95

-240

Note: All numbers are rounded to the nearest 5.

Source: London Economics’ analysis

Table 4 - Total direct, indirect and induced economic impact generated by higher education institutions’ expenditures in 2020-21, baseline vs. after pandemic, by cluster

Cluster 1

Cluster 2

Cluster 3

Cluster 4

Total

# of HEIs

2

38

67

18

125

 

Economic output (£m)

Baseline

£12,175m

£55,993m

£29,842m

£3,939m

£101,949m

After pandemic

£11,964m

£52,506m

£27,669m

£3,655m

£95,795m

Difference

(£211m)

(£3,487m)

(£2,172m)

(£284m)

(£6,154m)

Employment (headcount)

Baseline

60,785

531,260

343,485

47,635

983,165

After pandemic

59,740

498,275

318,350

44,180

920,545

Difference

-1,045

-32,985

-25,135

-3,455

-62,620

Note: Staff numbers are rounded to the nearest 5, and monetary estimates are rounded to the nearest £m.

Source: London Economics’ analysis

Table 5 - Estimated net cash inflow from operating activities (in £m and as a % of income) in 2020-21, baseline vs. after pandemic, by institution cluster

Cluster 1

Cluster 2

Cluster 3

Cluster 4

Total

# of HEIs

2

38

67

18

125

 

Net cash inflow (% of total income)

 

Baseline

3.5%

9.1%

10.4%

9.7%

9.8%

After pandemic

1.7%

2.2%

3.4%

2.5%

2.9%

 

Net cash inflow (per institution)

 

Baseline

£79m

£47m

£18m

£8m

£26m

After pandemic

£36m

£10m

£5m

£2m

£6m

# of HEIs with net cash inflow <5%

Baseline

1

5

10

5

21

After pandemic

2

31

47

11

91

 

# of HEIs with net cash inflow <0%

 

Baseline

0

1

4

2

7

After pandemic

1

12

16

7

36

Note: All monetary estimates are rounded to the nearest £m.

Source: London Economics’ analysis

Table 6 - Estimated impact of the pandemic on first-year student enrolments in 2020-21, ‘capped’ vs. ‘uncapped’ students, by institution cluster

Cluster 1

Cluster 2

Cluster 3

Cluster 4

Total

# of HEIs

2

38

67

18

125

 

Decline in first-year students

‘Capped’ students (UK and EU UG FT only)

-880

-23,590

-42,480

-8,775

-75,725

‘Uncapped’ students

-4,515

-79,005

-64,270

-8,380

-156,170

Total

-5,395

-102,595

-106,750

-17,155

-231,895

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cap on UK and EU-domiciled UG FT students

 

 

 

 

 

100% of 2018-19 enrolments

5,780

148,150

259,860

49,500

463,290

105% of 2018-19 enrolments

6,070

155,560

272,855

51,975

486,455

Difference with additional 5%

290

7,410

12,995

2,475

23,165

Ratio of decline in total to ‘capped’ students

Ratio

6.1

4.3

2.5

2.0

3.1

Note: All student numbers are rounded to the nearest 5.

Source: London Economics’ analysis

Director of HEPI, Nick Hillman, said:

It is great to see UCU and London Economics collaborating on such a detailed and important piece of work, which is based in part on some pre-crisis work undertaken for HEPI and Kaplan. I welcome the focus on the next financial year [2020/21], which is when the real pain will hit higher education, as well as the focus on what the crisis means for staff in higher education institutions and for the different regions of the UK.

But the research needs to be part of the debate; it must not be regarded as the final word. We are in a very uncertain place right now. No one can accurately and securely predict what will happen with the progress of Covid-19; nor can we know for certain its full impact on educational institutions.

There are grounds for querying some of the assumptions underlying the research. For example, the report assumes higher education will be considerably less attractive in 2020/21. Many dire predictions have been made on this already and no one seriously believes international student numbers will hold up. But, in a deep recession, some people may actually opt to stay in formal education. In short, the current crisis may nudge people who leave school (or graduate) while undecided about their next move to stay in education. In an economic crisis, deferring entry to the labour market makes more sense than opting for less education.

So I wouldn’t currently bet my house on the report’s conclusion idea that there will be 111,000 fewer first-year home students, a drop of 16%, in the next academic year. Such forecasts seem to be based on the sort of polling evidence on future behaviour that wrongly predicted big falls in full-time study in England when fees increased to £9,000, and they are not guaranteed to happen.

Moreover, the fine details that make up the headline totals matter a huge amount in research like this. This report assumes every single university will lose large numbers of students. So, for instance, it predicts 2,700 fewer first-year enrolments at each of Oxford and Cambridge – including around 900 fewer new home students at each place.

That seems odd when there is usually huge surplus demand to attend our oldest universities. Moreover, many people are so scared of other prestigious universities sucking up a greater market share of home / EU students in the crisis that they have been demanding restrictions on student recruitment – and it is widely believed Ministers are sympathetic to this idea.

No one should underestimate the severe impact of Covid-19 on higher education. But, given the diversity of our higher education sector, it is right to question how likely there is to be a severe recruitment crisis among all major student groups at every single institution.

Universities need government support and the new report is a welcome addition to the evidence base explaining why this is so, but I still question the idea that it is based on ‘relatively optimistic outcomes for higher education providers’.

Above all, we must be careful we do not foster the very conditions we want to avoid by letting pessimism take over. We must not only imply to our fellow citizens or to the rest of the world that UK universities are halfway to hell in a handcart when, in reality, every single conceivable model of a successful post-Covid and post-Brexit UK economy has our outward-facing universities at its heart.

And that, of course, is why – despite our differences on the best ways to model the effect of the current crisis on the higher education sector – I agree with London Economics and the UCU that our universities need proper support in the months ahead.

You may also be interested in these articles:

Advertisers

Upcoming FE Events

Advertiser Skyscrapers

Newsroom Activity

Jo Moriani added a new event 4 minutes ago

CAN “VIRTUAL” EVER BE “REAL” WORK EXPERIENCE? THE TRIED,...

Overview The COVID pandemic has had a serious impact on work-based learning, e.g placements ranging from school work experience to apprenticeships....

  • Wednesday, 25 November 2020 10:00 AM
  • Online
Jo Moriani added a new event 7 minutes ago

THE ROLE OF LEADERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT IN ENSURING...

Overview Rupert Crossland, Director of Audit and Compliance at Professional Assessment Ltd provides an insight into fundamental provider governance,...

  • Tuesday, 24 November 2020 10:00 AM
  • Online
Karolina Throssell has published a new article: Long Life Dairy Soars to Top of the Class 1 hour 19 minutes ago

Latest Education News

Further Education News

The FE News Channel gives you the latest education news and updates on emerging education strategies and the #FutureofEducation and the #FutureofWork.

Providing trustworthy and positive Further Education news and views since 2003, we are a digital news channel with a mixture of written word articles, podcasts and videos. Our specialisation is providing you with a mixture of the latest education news, our stance is always positive, sector building and sharing different perspectives and views from thought leaders, to provide you with a think tank of new ideas and solutions to bring the education sector together and come up with new innovative solutions and ideas.

FE News publish exclusive peer to peer thought leadership articles from our feature writers, as well as user generated content across our network of over 3000 Newsrooms, offering multiple sources of the latest education news across the Education and Employability sectors.

FE News also broadcast live events, podcasts with leading experts and thought leaders, webinars, video interviews and Further Education news bulletins so you receive the latest developments in Skills News and across the Apprenticeship, Further Education and Employability sectors.

Every week FE News has over 200 articles and new pieces of content per week. We are a news channel providing the latest Further Education News, giving insight from multiple sources on the latest education policy developments, latest strategies, through to our thought leaders who provide blue sky thinking strategy, best practice and innovation to help look into the future developments for education and the future of work.

In May 2020, FE News had over 120,000 unique visitors according to Google Analytics and over 200 new pieces of news content every week, from thought leadership articles, to the latest education news via written word, podcasts, video to press releases from across the sector.

We thought it would be helpful to explain how we tier our latest education news content and how you can get involved and understand how you can read the latest daily Further Education news and how we structure our FE Week of content:

Main Features

Our main features are exclusive and are thought leadership articles and blue sky thinking with experts writing peer to peer news articles about the future of education and the future of work. The focus is solution led thought leadership, sharing best practice, innovation and emerging strategy. These are often articles about the future of education and the future of work, they often then create future education news articles. We limit our main features to a maximum of 20 per week, as they are often about new concepts and new thought processes. Our main features are also exclusive articles responding to the latest education news, maybe an insight from an expert into a policy announcement or response to an education think tank report or a white paper.

FE Voices

FE Voices was originally set up as a section on FE News to give a voice back to the sector. As we now have over 3,000 newsrooms and contributors, FE Voices are usually thought leadership articles, they don’t necessarily have to be exclusive, but usually are, they are slightly shorter than Main Features. FE Voices can include more mixed media with the Further Education News articles, such as embedded podcasts and videos. Our sector response articles asking for different comments and opinions to education policy announcements or responding to a report of white paper are usually held in the FE Voices section. If we have a live podcast in an evening or a radio show such as SkillsWorldLive radio show, the next morning we place the FE podcast recording in the FE Voices section.

Sector News

In sector news we have a blend of content from Press Releases, education resources, reports, education research, white papers from a range of contributors. We have a lot of positive education news articles from colleges, awarding organisations and Apprenticeship Training Providers, press releases from DfE to Think Tanks giving the overview of a report, through to helpful resources to help you with delivering education strategies to your learners and students.

Podcasts

We have a range of education podcasts on FE News, from hour long full production FE podcasts such as SkillsWorldLive in conjunction with the Federation of Awarding Bodies, to weekly podcasts from experts and thought leaders, providing advice and guidance to leaders. FE News also record podcasts at conferences and events, giving you one on one podcasts with education and skills experts on the latest strategies and developments.

We have over 150 education podcasts on FE News, ranging from EdTech podcasts with experts discussing Education 4.0 and how technology is complimenting and transforming education, to podcasts with experts discussing education research, the future of work, how to develop skills systems for jobs of the future to interviews with the Apprenticeship and Skills Minister.

We record our own exclusive FE News podcasts, work in conjunction with sector partners such as FAB to create weekly podcasts and daily education podcasts, through to working with sector leaders creating exclusive education news podcasts.

Education Video Interviews

FE News have over 700 FE Video interviews and have been recording education video interviews with experts for over 12 years. These are usually vox pop video interviews with experts across education and work, discussing blue sky thinking ideas and views about the future of education and work.

Events

FE News has a free events calendar to check out the latest conferences, webinars and events to keep up to date with the latest education news and strategies.

FE Newsrooms

The FE Newsroom is home to your content if you are a FE News contributor. It also help the audience develop relationship with either you as an individual or your organisation as they can click through and ‘box set’ consume all of your previous thought leadership articles, latest education news press releases, videos and education podcasts.

Do you want to contribute, share your ideas or vision or share a press release?

If you want to write a thought leadership article, share your ideas and vision for the future of education or the future of work, write a press release sharing the latest education news or contribute to a podcast, first of all you need to set up a FE Newsroom login (which is free): once the team have approved your newsroom (all content, newsrooms are all approved by a member of the FE News team- no robots are used in this process!), you can then start adding content (again all articles, videos and podcasts are all approved by the FE News editorial team before they go live on FE News). As all newsrooms and content are approved by the FE News team, there will be a slight delay on the team being able to review and approve content.

 RSS IconRSS Feed Selection Page