The Educational ‘Big Bang’: Why The Microcredentials Explosion Is Imminent And What It All Means
Revolution In Education
A very significant structural shift in British education since the expansion of universities in the 1990s is imminent. While the headlines focus on tuition fees or teacher retention, a more profound revolution is taking place – one that challenges the very monopoly of the three-year degree.
The imminent explosion of microcredentials is a policy inevitability. With the rollout of the Lifelong Learning Entitlement in 2025, the UK Government will effectively decouple funding from the “full degree,” allowing learners to borrow money for individual modules and short courses. This legislative change is the spark that will ignite the powder keg. For the first time, the “atomisation” of education – that is breaking learning down into stackable, verifiable blocks – will have the financial backing of the State.
What Are Microcredentials?
A simple definition is that a microcredential is a certification of assessed learning that is smaller than a traditional degree. This has transformative power – previously, a degree acted as a broad signal of general intelligence, competence and “time served”; a microcredential is a laser-focused verification of a specific skill or competency.
Microcredentials can be technical, things like “Data Visualisation with Python” or “Carbon Literacy for Construction”. However, they are increasingly used to capture the “soft” or “power” skills which employers desperately need, such as leadership, resilience and complex problem-solving.
They are becoming popular because the “shelf life” of traditional skills has collapsed. The World Economic Forum estimates that 50% of all employees will need reskilling by 2025. In this volatile landscape, committing three years to a static syllabus seems increasingly anachronistic. Learners need “just-in-time” education.
The Global Context: A World Moving Faster Than Us
A global movement is already validating the microcredentials model:
- United States: Major tech giants like Google and IBM effectively bypassed the university gatekeepers years ago, creating their own “Career Certificates” on platforms like Coursera. These are now treated as equivalent to four-year degrees for roles within their own companies. The University of Texas System has launched the “Texas Credentials for the Future” initiative, embedding these industry-recognized badges directly into their degree programmes.
- Australia: The Australian government has already implemented a “National Microcredentials Framework,” standardising how these short courses are designed and recognized, ensuring they have currency across the entire economy.
- Europe: The European Union is rapidly aligning the European Credit Transfer and Accumulation System (ECTS) to microcredentials, effectively creating a common currency for skills which can cross borders as easily as euros.
In the UK, there are some organisations like University Academy 92 (UA92) in Manchester which are positioning themselves at the forefront of a major transformation in higher education by embracing microcredentials as a way to personalise and individualise learning. That university is now actively moving away from traditional course credits towards a modular system which promotes character development alongside purely academic qualifications. This approach will allow learners to build bespoke portfolios by combining modules from multiple institutions, creating unique pathways tailored to their career goals. UA92 sees this shift as essential for making education more flexible and accessible, ultimately enhancing employability by focusing on practical skills and character development rather than rigid degree structures. Their commitment signals a broader trend that could reshape the sector, with smaller universities leading the way in adapting to new funding models and learner expectations.
Why Is Traditional Education So Slow To React?
If the demand is potentially so high, why are our schools and universities not already flooded with these options? The answer lies in the “supertanker” nature of traditional education:
- The infrastructure is built for linearity.
Timetables, funding models and Learning Management Systems are designed for students who matriculate in September and leave three years later. Accommodating a learner who wants to drop in for a six-week module on “Crisis Management” breaks the administrative infrastructure. - Cultural inertia.
For decades, the metric of success has been a “grade”; that is, a single letter or number summarising years of work. Moving to a “competency-based” model, where a student collects a portfolio of verified skills, requires a complete philosophical shift from “what did you score?” to “what can you do?”
A Superior Model For Youth And Employers
For young people, the current “all-or-nothing” degree model is increasingly high-risk. A microcredential approach offers a “low-stakes, high-reward” alternative. It allows a young person to “stack” qualifications at their own pace. They might earn a badge in “Digital Marketing” alongside their A-levels, or a “Team Leadership” credential during a summer job. This provides immediate currency in the job market, rather than forcing them to wait years for a return on their educational investment.
For employers, the benefits are even starker and more compelling. The traditional degree is often a “black box”. An employer sees a “2:1 in History” on the CV but has no idea if or how well the candidate can actually manage a project or analyse data.
Microcredentials break open the black box and allow you to look inside. They allow employers to practise “skills-based hiring.” Instead of filtering for a generic knowledge-based degree, a recruiter can filter for candidates with verified badges in specific competencies relevant to the role. That eliminates the guesswork and democratises access to jobs for talented young people who may not have thrived in a traditional academic setting but who possess the key skills required.
Digital Portfolios: Capturing The New Narrative
Digital portfolio platforms fit perfectly with this shift. If the future of education is no longer a single linear transcript but satellites of different skills and experiences, then a new way is needed for the learner to illustrate them and for a prospective employer to review them.
We are witnessing a big move away from the static CV to the dynamic portfolio. This represents the next generation of professional profiles.
The challenge with microcredentials has, to date, always been validation – anyone can claim they have “leadership skills” on a CV. However, a microcredential which is securely validated by a setting, such as a school, college or employer, acts as a digital proof-of-work.
Digital portfolio systems act as the “wallet” for this new currency. They allow a learner to capture their “individualised learner portfolio”, which is like a unique fingerprint of their achievements. As an example, this might include:
- A formal microcredential in, say, “coding” from a provider.
- A “character” badge for Resilience earned during a Duke of Edinburgh expedition.
- A “communication” module verified by a drama teacher.
By aggregating these verified data points, digital portfolio platforms solve the fragmentation problem. They take the “explosion” of microcredentials and organise them into a coherent narrative of the whole person by displaying skill, character and academic achievement combined.
Qualifications Are Not The Finish Line
The explosion of microcredentials is definitely not a fad; it is the necessary evolution of an education system for the new information age. The rigid, linear pathways of 20th Century education are no longer fit-for-purpose and are disappearing, replaced by a flexible, stackable ecosystem of skills. Students are empowered to build their own personal portfolios.
For educators and leaders, the call to action is: “stop viewing qualifications as a finish line and start viewing them as building blocks.”
We must move beyond the obsession with the “final grade” and start validating the specific skills and character traits which actually define a young person’s potential. The tools to do this are already emerging and being developed. The policy framework, like the LLE, is taking shape. The only remaining variable is our willingness to embrace the change.
By Neil Wolstenholme, Kloodle Chairman
Responses