New research by @TheIFS has shown that a degree from a UK university increases a person’s net earnings by £100k or more on average over their lifetime. However, one in five students would actually have been financially better off if they had they not gone to university.
Going to university is a very good investment for most students. Over their working lives, men will be £130,000 better off on average by going to university after taxes, student loan repayments and foregone earnings are taken into account. For women, this figure is £100,000. (These and other numbers are in “discounted present value” terms, which means counting earnings later in life less than those earned earlier on. Without discounting, returns look much bigger.)
Higher education graduates enjoy £100k earnings bonus over lifetime: New @TheIFS research for @EducationGovUK shows majority of graduates are better off for going to university A degree from a UK university increases a person’s net earnings by £100k or… https://t.co/pdLJVxsM6X pic.twitter.com/WIOXfqqYqp— FE News - The #FutureofEducation News Channel (@FENews) February 29, 2020
However, these average returns mask large differences across individuals:
While about 80% of students are likely to gain financially from attending university, we estimate that one in five students – or about 70,000 every year - would actually have been better off financially had they not gone to university.
At the other end of the spectrum, the 10% of graduates with the highest returns will on average gain around half a million pounds in discounted present value terms.
Much of this variation is explained by the subject studied at university:
- Students of medicine and law, for example, achieve very high returns on average, while
- Few of those studying creative arts will gain financially from their degrees at all
These are among the findings of new work at the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) commissioned by the Department for Education that investigates the lifetime returns to undergraduate degrees using the Longitudinal Education Outcomes (LEO) dataset. We control for students’ prior attainment and family background to estimate the causal effect of going to university on earnings and employment.
This report expands on previous IFS analysis using the LEO dataset, "The impact of undergraduate degrees on early career earnings in the UK". While previous work looked at the impact of undergraduate degrees on earnings at age 29, this work uses newly-linked additional LEO data on earlier cohorts to consider the impact on earnings over the whole life cycle.
We look at how much students earn and how much they pay in taxes and towards their student loans over their whole careers in order to get at the lifetime net financial benefit to the individual. We also calculate the benefit of degrees to the taxpayer, taking into account the government cost of providing student loans, as well as any changes in tax payments.
This study only looks at financial returns. Other personal and social benefits may be as or more important. We also only consider the effect of each student’s choices on their own earnings holding constant the choices of others, limiting the scope for using these results to predict the effects of major changes to the higher education system.
The key findings include
The average net lifetime earnings gain from undergraduate degrees is around £130k for men and £100k for women in discounted present value terms. For both men and women, this represents a gain in average net lifetime earnings of around 20%.
The subject studied at university is hugely important. Net discounted lifetime returns for women are close to zero on average for creative arts and languages graduates, but more than £250k for law, economics or medicine. Men studying creative arts have negative financial returns, while men studying medicine or economics have average returns of more than half a million pounds.
However, studying a subject with high average returns is no guarantee of high returns. While average returns to law and economics are high, many students will see much lower benefits from studying those subjects, and a few will see much higher returns. In contrast, subjects such as education and nursing do not have very high returns on average, but women who study these subjects almost universally achieve positive returns.
Overall, we expect 85% of women and around three-quarters of men to achieve positive net lifetime returns. This means that around one in five undergraduates would have been better off financially had they not gone to university. At the other end of the spectrum, the 10% of graduates with the highest returns will on average gain more than half a million pounds in discounted present value terms.
Financing undergraduate degrees is expensive for the taxpayer, but on average increased tax revenues more than make up for it. Overall, we estimate that the expected gain to the exchequer of an individual enrolling in an undergraduate course is around £110k per student for men and £30k per student for women.
However, these gains are driven mainly by the highest-earning graduates. We expect the exchequer to gain more than half a million pounds on average from the 10% of graduates with the highest exchequer returns, but to make a loss on the degrees of around 40% of men and half of women. This means that nearly half of all students receive a net government subsidy for their degrees, even after tax and National Insurance payments have been taken into account.
Jack Britton, co-author of the report and an Associate Director at IFS, said:
“This work highlights how important the thirties are for graduate men. Rapid earnings growth of male graduates in this period has a large positive impact on their average return to higher education such that three quarters of men end up better off as a result of having done a degree. However, even when looking over the whole life cycle, around a quarter of men have negative financial returns to undergraduate degrees.”
Ben Waltmann, co-author of the report and a Research Economist at IFS, said:
“The exchequer gains a lot on average from higher education, despite the high costs of writing off unpaid student loans. That is mainly because high-earning graduates go on to pay an awful lot of tax. But this analysis also shows that the government makes an overall loss on financing the degrees of nearly half of all graduates. These losses are concentrated amongst those studying certain subjects. For creative arts, for example, the losses are substantial. This need not mean that the government is misallocating funds, but it is important to be aware of the costs involved.”
My point about #degree courses is that they are manifestly not all the same, even when called the same title, albeit awarded by competing universities, says @TomBewick - Yet costs are exactly the same, regardless of #ValueForMoneyhttps://t.co/Tlwuqx8vn2— FE News - The #FutureofEducation News Channel (@FENews) February 29, 2020
A degree is not just about money but must deliver quality and value, new Universities Minister Michelle Donelan said:
“This research underlines that our university sector is world leading by setting out the impact higher education can have on someone’s life.
“When you add the unquantifiable experiences and friendships that come with that, it is no surprise our universities attract students from all over the world.
“However, that prestige is built on quality and my role is to work with the regulator to safeguard that, while ensuring students and the taxpayer are getting the value they would expect for their investment.”
Nicola Dandridge, chief executive of the Office for Students, said:
“As this research demonstrates, higher education can have clear financial benefits for graduates. It is crucial that prospective students have access to clear and factual information about what and where they might study, and data on earnings potential is an important part of that picture.”
“Of course, there are many other important reasons why students choose to go to university beyond financial return. As well as the major contributions that graduates make to the UK economy, higher education delivers important social, educational, and cultural benefits to individuals and wider society.”
“We must also ensure that there is equal opportunity for students to access these benefits. That is why we have required universities and colleges to make significant improvements in ensuring fair access and participation for all students, regardless of their background.”
Alistair Jarvis, Chief Executive of Universities UK, said:
“The evidence is clear that a degree from the UK’s world-leading university sector continues to give a significant boost to a graduate’s salary and career prospects. These graduates, including those who go on to work in sectors where salaries are relatively low, make vital contributions to the wider economy and to society.
“We particularly welcome government reflecting that the benefits of a degree stretch far beyond salary outcomes. UUK recently published recommendations for a new way of defining and measuring the ‘value’ of a degree to help universities to show openly and consistently how they make a difference. We are looking forward to working with government to further explore this new proposed approach.”
Going to university is a very good investment for most students – but 1 in 5 would be better off financially if they hadn’t done a degree.⁰— IFS (@TheIFS) February 29, 2020
While #highereducation can have many personal and social benefits, we explore its impact on lifetime earnings.https://t.co/K6Sxqbg5S1 pic.twitter.com/rDKq9rOfi8